Bajaj Housing Q1 FY27 Earnings Call — Analysis (NSE: BAJAJHFL)
Bajaj Housing Finance reports 33% disbursement growth in Q1FY27 but guides NIM to moderate 20–25 bps for the full year amid yield compression.
The take
Q1FY27 Net Total Income ₹1,175 Cr ( +16% YoY ) . New guidance — FY27 operating efficiency (opex to n… 19%–20% . New story: NIM compression from yield attrition .
Results
Revenue (net total income) ₹1,175 Cr +16% YoY; PAT ₹715 Cr +23% YoY; AUM ₹1,49,600 Cr +24% YoY; NIM 3.7% (-14 bps QoQ); GNPA 29 bps, credit cost 5 bps annualised.
Financial highlights
| Metric | Value | Change | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUM | ₹1,49,600 Cr | +24% | yoy · Q1FY27 |
| Disbursements | ₹19,509 Cr | +33% | yoy · Q1FY27 |
| Net Total Income | ₹1,175 Cr | +16% | yoy · Q1FY27 |
| PAT | ₹715 Cr | +23% | yoy · Q1FY27 |
| NIM | 3.7% | -14 bps | qoq · Q1FY27 |
| Gross Spread | 1.7% | +0 bps | qoq · Q1FY27 |
| GNPA | 29 bps | +2 bps | qoq · Q1FY27 |
| NNPA | 12 bps | +1 bps | qoq · Q1FY27 |
| Annualised Credit Cost | 5 bps | -10 bps | yoy · Q1FY27 |
| Cost of Funds | 7.2% | -7 bps | qoq · Q1FY27 |
| Opex to Net Income | 19.6% | -160 bps | yoy · Q1FY27 |
| ROA (annualised) | 2.3% | +0 bps | qoq · Q1FY27 |
| ROE | 12.5% | +90 bps | yoy · Q1FY27 |
| Capital Adequacy Ratio | 21.59% | point_in_time · Q1FY27 · as of 30 Jun 2026 | |
| Principal Business Criteria | 61.46% | point_in_time · Q1FY27 · regulatory requirement 60% |
Guidance
FY27 NIM expected to moderate 20–25 bps from FY26; credit cost guided at 10–15 bps; operating efficiency 19–20%; ROA 2.1–2.3%; ROE 12.5–13%; leverage ~6.1x by year-end.
What management committed to
- NIM is expected to moderate by 20–25 bps during FY27 from what it was in FY26. — 20–25 bps, FY27
- [FY27] operating efficiency (opex to net income) will be in the range of 19% to 20%. — 19%–20%, FY27
- [FY27] GNPA will remain in the range of 30–35 bps. — 30–35 bps, FY27
- [FY27] credit costs will be in the range of 10–15 bps. — 10–15 bps, FY27
- [FY27] provisioning coverage on GNPA will stay between 50% and 60%. — 50%–60%, FY27
- [FY27] ROA is assessed to be in the range of 2.1% to 2.3%. — 2.1%–2.3%, FY27
- [FY27] leverage is likely to end the year at around 6.1x, within a range of 5.8–6.3x. — ~6.1x (range 5.8–6.3x), FY27
- [Sambhav Housing] is on track to achieve a disbursement target of INR600 crores plus in the next 9 months (i.e., by Q4FY27). — INR600 crores plus, Q4FY27
- Overall Sambhav housing average ticket size may move down from the current INR28 lakh to INR26–27 lakh by year‑end, driven by greater share of non‑metro locations. — INR26–27 lakh (from INR28 lakh), FY27
- [Q2FY27] cost of funds will be sideways with a downward bias compared to Q1’s 7.2%. — sideways with a downward bias (≤7.2%), Q2FY27
Key themes
Strong AUM growth, margin normalization
How the narrative shifted
- NIM compression from yield attrition: Management explains that in a stable interest‑rate environment, higher‑yielding legacy loans run off and are replaced at lower acquisition rates, compressing NIM; they guide a 20–25 bps reduction for FY27.
- Strong AUM growth momentum: Record quarterly AUM growth (₹8,918 Cr) and disbursements (₹19,509 Cr) across all product segments, driven by deepening, widening, and Sambhav scale‑up.
- Sambhav Housing expansion: Sambhav (affordable/near‑prime) run rate accelerated sequentially and is on track to cross ₹600 Cr monthly; geographic expansion into non‑metro locations to gradually reduce ticket sizes.
- Resilient asset quality: GNPA at 29 bps and low credit cost of 5 bps (one‑off aided by assignment); full‑year guidance of 30–35 bps GNPA and 10–15 bps credit cost signals confidence in portfolio health.
- Macro‑driven cost‑of‑funds improvement: Cost of funds fell 7 bps QoQ due to maturity of higher‑cost borrowings and hedging; Q2 seen sideways‑to‑down, but yield compression is the primary margin driver.
- Tech/AI‑led operational efficiency: New panel showcases AI deployment across the loan lifecycle to improve controllership and customer experience; not a near‑term margin driver but a positioning element.
Operational commentary
- Sambhav Housing monthly disbursement run rate rose to ₹450–465 Cr in Q1 (from ₹410–425 Cr in Q4); on track for >₹600 Cr within nine months; 73 urban + 72 rural locations; affordable mix ~33–36% of disbursements; salaried mix 68%; ~65% of customers with bureau score >750.
- AI initiatives deployed across loan lifecycle (origination, underwriting, collateral assessment, customer service) for controllership and efficiency; key modules: voice agent, credit PD call intelligence, collateral intelligence, geo-analytics, AI customer assist, AI interview agent.
- ₹2,300 Cr loan assignment executed in Q1 (normal course, ~12–13% of AUM); led to release of Stage 1 provisions and lower credit cost.
- Borrowing mix well diversified: money market 52%, bank borrowings 38%, NHB refinance 10%; NCD mix up 2.6% sequentially.
- Geographic presence at 224 branches across 182 locations.
- Portfolio composition: home loans 54.1%, LAP 10.3%, LRD 23.1%, developer finance 11.4%.
Analyst Q&A
Q. Breakdown of the 20–25 bps NIM compression and potential for upward repricing of loans.
Compression is entirely yield‑driven because in a stable rate regime the legacy higher‑yield book attrit and is replaced at lower acquisition IRRs; limited repricing opportunity as market pricing remains rangebound, with only a mix shift toward Sambhav providing some uptick.
Q. Reason for very low 5 bps credit cost vs full‑year 10–15 bps guidance.
One‑off factors: a large ₹2,300 Cr assignment out released Stage 1 provisions, and no repeat of the Q4FY26 Stage 2 provision build‑up for macro uncertainty.
Q. Why provisioning did not increase when accounts moved from Stage 2 to Stage 3 in LAP and developer finance.
LAP pool dynamics: older NPA accounts rolled back with higher provisioning offset new entries at lower DPD provisioning. In developer finance, the one account was already provisioned at 48–49% in Stage 2, above the 33–34% required at 90 DPD, so no incremental provision needed.
Q. What is driving the reduction in portfolio attrition (BT‑out) and who has stepped off the pedal?
Attrition is lower but still being watched; it is not that competitors have ceded space, but the company is gaining a bit more from industry growth through deepening and widening efforts, and BT‑out pressures have eased slightly in prime home loans.
Research and educational content only. Not investment advice.